?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A City for All Editions

Crossposted from: http://parsantium.wordpress.blog

On Saturday I ran my paragon tier 4e D&D game, tonight I’m playtesting D&D Next online, and on Monday night I’m playing in Pathfinder’s Rise of the Runelords adventure path. Oh, and I’m reading the 13th Age pdf at the moment and eagerly awaiting my print copy of the rulebook. I don’t think I’m the only one in this situation, so I’m very keen that Parsantium: City at the Crossroads is easily usable with whatever edition of D&D or D&D-like game you are playing. There aren’t really any game mechanics or stats in the book for this very reason – the model I’m using is that of Green Ronin’s Pirate’s Guide to Freeport or recent WotC books like Menzoberranzan: City of Intrigue. Story and flavour over stat blocks.

As I ploughed through the first draft of the book, I included all the stuff that had been in my 4e Parsantium campaign, including dragonborn, eladrin and genasi, as well as references to spells, magic items and other cool stuff from earlier editions and Pathfinder that don’t necessarily exist in 4th edition. I knew I couldn’t include beholders, mind flayers and yuan-ti, but a lot of other D&D references are in there. In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been revising the manuscript and I realised I needed to make a call on whether I would use the GSL, OGL, both, or neither in the book.

After a lot of thought and some helpful advice from some sensible folks in the industry and on message boards, I’ve come to the conclusion that trying to use both the GSL and OGL correctly would require the (expensive) services of a lawyer to make sure I didn’t get it wrong, and I’d much rather spend my money on better art for the book. Since I need to include stuff that isn’t in 4e, I’ve made a decision to go with the more straightforward OGL and use Pathfinder/OGL equivalents where necessary (so eladrin become high elves etc). There’s also been a fair bit of interest in the book on the Paizo boards so it sounds like putting a “Pathfinder compatible” logo on the front might help sales.

I really do want to stress the book is (almost) systemless though. It refers to D&D tropes like otyughs, slippers of spider climbing and magic missile but it doesn’t contain stat blocks for the NPCs or monsters. You can use it with Pathfinder, 4e, D&D Next, AD&D, 13th Age or whatever D&D-like fantasy RPG you like. The one thing I am planning is to add the kind of NPC shorthand you got in old AD&D books so the text might say “Yuroslav Bloodclaw (N male gnoll druid 9)” before launching into the NPC’s description just to give an idea of how powerful (or not) a particular character is.

Any thoughts on this approach? Aside from putting the words “For Use with All Editions of the World’s Most Popular Fantasy Roleplaying Games” in giant letters on the cover, is there anything else I should do to get the “all welcome” message across?

Maison Tiskiwin, Marrakesh

Comments

( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
mordicai
Jun. 27th, 2013 09:02 pm (UTC)
Maybe even a disclaimer to THAT disclaimer, like "or any other players of fantastic adventure games," since even like, a Burning Wheel DM could mine it for ideas?
richgreen01
Jun. 27th, 2013 10:22 pm (UTC)
Good suggestion - that could work! I don't know Burning Wheel but anyone running a medieval fantasy RPG could make use of the setting
raging_swan
Jun. 30th, 2013 07:13 am (UTC)
Your phraseology works for me.
richgreen01
Jun. 30th, 2013 07:50 am (UTC)
Thanks Creighton!
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2017
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner